M. Inglis
To Win
H. Kinoshita
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L W W L L W W LForm
L L L L L L L W W LThey have played 2 sets in total, with Inglis winning 2 and Lohoff winning 0. The last match between Inglis and Lohoff was at the Chicago Fall Tennis Classic - Chicago, 25-09-2021, Q1 round, Hard with Maddison Inglis getting the victory 6-2 6-2.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Maddison Inglis | 1 |
Julia Lohoff | 0 |
Chicago Fall Tennis Classic - Chicago(25-09-2021)
22 Apr 2025 / First
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-2 6-2 |
![]() ![]()
Maddison Inglis
Player
Julia Lohoff
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
12 | Games Won | 4 |
3 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
0 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
1:12:0 | Average Match Time | 1:12:0 |
66% (35/53) | 1st Serve % | 63% (36/57) |
66% (23/35) | 1st Serve Win % | 47% (17/36) |
61% (11/18) | 2nd Serve Win % | 38% (8/21) |
71% (5/7) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 14% (1/7) |
56% (32/57) | Return Points Win % | 36% (19/53) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
![]() ![]()
Rebeka Masarova
Player
Maddison Inglis
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
63)
13
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
4
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
63
|
6-1 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Maddison Inglis
Player
Erika Andreeva
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve %
56%
(
46 of
82)
4
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
5
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
77
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Maddison Inglis
Player
Emily Appleton
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve %
51%
(
24 of
47)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
70%
(
16 of
23)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
23)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
11 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Anna Bondar
Player
Maddison Inglis
52%
(
44 of
84)
1st Serve %
58%
(
53 of
92)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
10
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
53%
(
21 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
31 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
92)
94
Total Points Won
82
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Sofia Kenin
Player
Maddison Inglis
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Maddison Inglis
Player
Aoi Ito
61%
(
51 of
84)
1st Serve %
62%
(
49 of
79)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
35 of
49)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
34 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
79)
83
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Maddison Inglis
Player
Anna Bondar
62%
(
47 of
76)
1st Serve %
46%
(
31 of
68)
0
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
3
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
24 of
31)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
28 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
68)
77
Total Points Won
67
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Cristina Bucsa
Player
Maddison Inglis
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
52%
(
28 of
54)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
6
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Maddison Inglis
Player
Jennifer Jackson
41%
(
26 of
64)
1st Serve %
42%
(
32 of
77)
8
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
7
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
63%
(
24 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
18 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
77)
79
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
F |
![]() ![]()
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Maddison Inglis
61%
(
77 of
126)
1st Serve %
60%
(
56 of
93)
3
Aces
4
9
Double Faults
5
60%
(
46 of
77)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
47%
(
23 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
45%
(
57 of
126)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
42 of
93)
111
Total Points Won
108
|
6-2 4-6 7-6(2) | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Julia Lohoff
Player
Madlena Orlova
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve %
60%
(
29 of
48)
1
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
8
56%
(
23 of
41)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
16%
(
3 of
19)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
46%
(
28 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Julia Lohoff
Player
Jennifer Luikham
83%
(
34 of
41)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
29%
(
2 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
13 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
34
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Kristina Mladenovic
Player
Julia Lohoff
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
63%
(
26 of
41)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
7%
(
1 of
15)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
42%
(
25 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
62
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Maddison Inglis
Player
Julia Lohoff
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Ekaterina Alexandrova
Player
Julia Lohoff
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
11
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
54
Total Points Won
27
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Amandine Hesse
Player
Julia Lohoff
56%
(
22 of
39)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
8
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
5 of
24)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
13 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Jule Niemeier
Player
Julia Lohoff
57%
(
37 of
65)
1st Serve %
68%
(
40 of
59)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
25 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Natalia Vikhlyantseva
Player
Julia Lohoff
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
59%
(
45 of
76)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
7
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
23 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Daniela Seguel
Player
Julia Lohoff
75%
(
46 of
61)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
60% (293/197) | Win/Loss | 56% (239/186) |
58% (656/469) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (526/428) |
53% (5449/4762) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (4498/4068) |
62% (235/146) | Hard Win/Loss | 67% (121/59) |
48% (21/23) | Clay Win/Loss | 47% (84/94) |
36% (4/7) | Indoor Hard W/L | 51% (34/33) |
61% (33/21) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
0.15 | Aces Per Game | 0.04 |
739 | Aces Total | 148 |
0.26 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.14 |
1305 | Total Double Faults | 586 |
1:28:10 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
444.74 | Average Opponent Rank | 624.38 |
65% (18158/27741) | 1st Serve % | 69% (9004/13135) |
63% (11374/18158) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (5228/9004) |
47% (4469/9583) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (1823/4131) |
48% (1670/3487) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 51% (911/1779) |
45% (12939/28697) | Return Points Win % | 48% (6401/13423) |
44% (16/20) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
27% (3/8) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
40% (18/27) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/3) |
0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
64% (249/140) | Challenger W/L | 45% (66/80) |
78% (7/2) | Futures W/L | 63% (173/103) |
60% (289/479) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (237/420) |
0% (0/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
65% (62/95) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (37/69) |
53% (80/152) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (59/109) |
85% (289/247) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 92% (224/206) |
15% (289/42) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 8% (224/18) |
23% (201/46) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (201/32) |